Thanks to Pelosi, new populism has been vindicated!

The Oxford Union decided to debate the motion, “This House Believes Populism is a Threat to Democracy.” The motion is deliberately biased, misrepresenting what populism truly is from the outset. By the way, I am not a populist but a Conservative and I do support most of the policies and ideas proposed by the people who describe themselves as Populist and of course support Trump. 

There are over 70 million people in the USA, including myself, who are willing to support something labeled as a “threat to democracy.” You appreciate I do not have an issue with democracy itself whatsoever; my problem lies with individuals like Nancy Pelosi and her thought process. 

I was informed that she is one of the most disliked political figures among conservatives. As a Christian, I do not hate anyone created by God. However, as a conservative, I strongly disapprove of Pelosi and her politicsi. It’s not because she is influential among liberals or has made significant contributions to the country, but because she has consistently shown herself to be problematic with her mouth (yes more than Trump),and her stressful look out, especially since Trump’s election in 2016.

I am well-acquainted with the modern left. A family friend’s daughter, who is a teacher, mentioned that they believe the Electoral College system needs reform because it allowed Trump to win in 2016. I pointed out that she probably had no objections when Obama was elected for two terms.

These individuals are short-sighted, swayed by what they hear on TV or social media, and unable to think independently. The same system that elected Trump later elected Biden. I wonder what she thinks now.

Additionally, it was the first time that I had heard some of the most disparaging comments about the Founding Fathers of the USA from this young person. If anyone witnessed the conversation I had with her, they would never vote for those who share such views. These are the people whom Biden and Pelosi rely on. They may not necessarily believe what they believe in (far left even communist), but they need their support.

In Oxford debate Pelosi, in her wisdom, took an elitist position and referred to people like me as believing in the 3 G’s and having ‘poor souls.

When I heard her say this, my first thought was about her lack of soul, which is worse than having a “poor soul.” She referred to the 3 G’s as Guns, Gays, and God. I don’t have any problem with any of these 3 G’s. Was she implying that populists hate gays? If so you can’t mix your apples with oranges. But that is another lesson. Additionally, neither gays nor heterosexuals are the problem; the real problem is having brainless politicians. That’s truly scary and possibly the real threat to democracy. What do you think?

A bad politician yes but Pelosi also lies. She’s not good at it, but when you lack a soul, you don’t worry about the truth. She claimed that a “snake oil salesman” (Trump) took office and passed legislation benefiting 83% of the benefits (what ever this means) to the top 1% of taxpayers. Trump did much more than that. For instance, he reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 19%, benefiting businesses of all sizes. If you want to know more about Trump’s accomplishments, watch my video “Trump Must Win.“

Pelosi spewed many other falsehoods during this debate; you can watch it here. As she finished her speech, she continued to lie, professing her appreciation for the flag and the Pledge of Allegiance. If you are going to watch her please don’t forget to watch Winston Marshall’s closing remarks. He destroys Pelosi.

Isn’t it people like her and her supporters who burn the US flag in the streets? Aren’t they the unpatriotic ones? When you descend into such hysteria about 50% of the voters in the USA, you forget who you really are.

Trump must win, otherwise we facing…I don’t even want to think about what we are facing.